I'll be led. I would say it is our interpretation that gives them faces, the clouds theimselves neither needing or having faces. The face in a cloud veiwed from a different angle, or by many other creatures would not see the face, or may see different charectoristics in this araingement of pixels... Either that or it is the pixies.
I have that edited birchwoman on here. Think I am mainly going for realistic or 'real' ones...
2 comments:
i've been biting my tongue all this time, but...
who 'puts' the faces in the clouds (etc)? were they 'always' there? or (now i'm leading you) do we just 'see' them?
you tag "nature face" but does nature have a face? can it? (you didn't mean that i'm sure)
also, i've seen some really obviously edited ones (not here). would these count?
[there, just to prove i'm a meddling pseudo-philosopher]
I'll be led. I would say it is our interpretation that gives them faces, the clouds theimselves neither needing or having faces. The face in a cloud veiwed from a different angle, or by many other creatures would not see the face, or may see different charectoristics in this araingement of pixels... Either that or it is the pixies.
I have that edited birchwoman on here. Think I am mainly going for realistic or 'real' ones...
Post a Comment